Taking Earth

2017

Sci-Fi

90
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 20%
IMDb Rating 2.8 10 838

Synopsis


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Downloaded 58,378 times
March 02, 2018 at 08:19 PM

Cast

720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
1.1 GB
1280*534
English
NR
24 fps
1hr 40 min
P/S 2 / 34
2.01 GB
1920*800
English
NR
24 fps
1hr 40 min
P/S 3 / 24

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by tcplotts 1 / 10

Thought this was going to be an Asylum opus...

Since Netflix continues to try and camouflage its "bad movie" stash (by getting rid of star ratings), it's hard to know what you're wading into. Anyway, I figured this was an Asylum rip off of something. Lo and behold, I ran into something much, much worse.

I raised the white flag at about 18 minutes, which I thought was pretty sporting of me.

This is the worst movie I've seen this year. By quite a bit. This will appeal to a small subset of "so bad it's good" viewers, so if you appreciate low skill and even lower budget, this might not be too bad. The script has some howlers in it. The "actors"....hahahahaha.

Let this one go by and watch Battlefield Earth instead if you have to watch a crappy Sci-Fi film. That one's more fun.

Reviewed by briandraiger 1 / 10

Wow - I didn't know a movie could be this bad

I don't even have the words to describe how bad this movie is. It's like if "god-awfully horrible" and "threwup in my mouth a little" got together and had a child... but a child that had radiation poisoning, dipped in acid, and struck by lightening. And its not that its just that bad.. but it goes on and on for an hour and 40 minutes. I see that most of the cast isn't giving their name - that's probably a good idea. Now they just need to hide for a few years and hope no one sees this movie and recognizes them.

Reviewed by bobbyf 2 / 10

No excuses: Bad film is bad film.

When a movie isn't very good, it just isn't very good. When you rate a film higher than it should be rated because a) it was made by your friends, b) it was done on a really low budget, c) it was made in a country where they usually don't make movies, d) gosh, they really tried hard, etc. then you're not being honest. "It's good for what it is" doesn't make it good. This movie isn't very good. Yes, the cinematography, at times, is the best part of this film. Some of the CGI is passable. One or two actors were OK, at times. Sadly the majority of this film comes off as amateurish and juvenile. The acting is high-school drama-ish. The script feels like it was written by a teenager. It's derivative of so many other films, in particular, "I am No. 4." The music isn't terrible, but it's placed inappropriately throughout the film. And the pacing, the timing, the editing... it's laborious.The romances were entirely unnecessary, and the film shifts focus so many times that it's hard to know what it's about. I think the film was hurt most by a lack of a consistent production design. It's all over the place and lacks continuity in look and feel. I think, as a project, it's a good first attempt by young film-makers, but it fails to stand up with serious, professional productions. If you take the time to watch it, (I saw it for free on Netflix) be prepared and don't expect much.

Read more IMDb reviews

7 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment