Star Trek: Generations


Action / Adventure / Mystery / Sci-Fi / Thriller

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 48%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 58%
IMDb Rating 6.6 10 66292


Uploaded By: OTTO
Downloaded 120,288 times
October 23, 2017 at 07:18 AM

720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
799.48 MB
23.976 fps
1hr 58 min
P/S 7 / 23
1.79 GB
23.976 fps
1hr 58 min
P/S 9 / 38

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by LeonLouisRicci 7 / 10

A Transitioinal Star Trek Film...From the Original to the Next

The "Star Trek" Franchise did Not have to Fuse the Original and the "Next Generation" On the Big Screen in the First Film from the New TV Series...but THEY DID!

So Fans of both Incarnations of the Never Ending Saga of Gene Roddenberry's Creation Waited to See, and the Nervous, Anxious, and Nerdy Fans were Ultimately Mixed....from Disappointment to outright Rage (hardly surprising).

Objectively and Viewed Outside the Trek "Bubble", it's Not a Bad Movie but Far from Great. There are Highlights that Entertain. Kirk and Picard's On Screen Meeting, Data's Emotion Chip, the Klingon Confrontation, and some Outstanding SFX.

The Film is Extremely Corny in Spots and as a Whole it doesn't Mesh very Well, but Overall it is Certainly Worth a Watch for Hardcore Fans (in fact a must see considering the series transition) and Casual Observers can have some Fun with the Iconic Display.

There would be Better "STNG" Films to come and there were Better "Star Trek" Movies before.

It could Never Capture the Old Crew without the Presence of Spock, Bones, and Sulu and given what was here to Work With, it can be Considered Worthy.

This was a Challenging Ploy that Didn't quite Come Together and could be Termed a "Misfire", and it is, but the Tricky Trek Transfer from One Generation to the Next is at Least Done with a Modicum of Honor and Respect.

Reviewed by InCole 6 / 10

Not the best, but also not the worst

In short Star Trek Generations is simply a big missed opportunity. Considering that just 3 years earlier Undiscovered Country came out and was hands down among the best Star Trek movies. This is a very weak follow-up of that film.

The opening of the film is quite OK but from there it just goes downhill. There is a lot of boring screen time filler scenes that simply do not serve a purpose and while the movie is redeemed by some really great scenes and some elements that make Star Trek so great. Sadly this is just a film with so much missed opportunity.

Considering they managed to bring together Kirk and Picard into one film you would expect so, so much more. Even if it was a film with just Picard it would have been quite mediocre.

It just lacks focus and direction in the script writing and in general it just feels like they really had to pull out all movie clich├ęs just to get the story to work.

It is watchable and it can be entertaining at times so I would still say to give it a watch especially if you are doing a Star Trek Bluray marathon (like I am doing) but just be prepared to experience a mediocre Star Trek film.

Reviewed by Jack Vasen 6 / 10

Better the first time

I enjoyed this movie thoroughly back when it came out. I was immersed in the story which was fairly good especially when you take into account the things that were done to appeal to original TOS Trekkie's. So much Star Trek tradition. There are some original ideas in this story. The Nexus and the idea of getting back is a different kind of take on time travel. Of course there are a billion holes in the story too, but after all, it is Star Trek and time travel, but none of the holes affect the enjoyment. Uniting Kirk and Picard - who can resist. Learning some Kirk and Picard backstory - also good.

What does affect the enjoyment, especially if you have see this before is the acting. Give Brent Spiner the award for the worst comedy ever in any Sci-Fi movie. I wonder if that was Spiner or the direction. Stewart overplays the sequence with Kirk and Picard, but seems like Shatner was dead on. The old TOS cast overplayed their parts but I suspect that was intentional. The TNG cast, especially Stewart, had highs and lows, and overall they were probably OK.

Read more IMDb reviews


Be the first to leave a comment