Foxfire: Confessions of a Girl Gang

2012

Action / Crime / Drama

6
IMDb Rating 6.1/10 10 2374 2.4K

Please enable your VPN when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPN, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Private VPN

Plot summary

Set in the 1950s, a a group of young girls in upstate New York form their own gang.


Uploaded by: OTTO
April 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM

Director

Top cast

Michelle Nolden as Well to do lady
Ali Liebert as Muriel Orvis
Rob Stewart as Man in Bus
Catherine Disher as Mrs. O'Hagan
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
980.34 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
2 hr 23 min
Seeds 1
2.04 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
2 hr 23 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by SnoopyStyle 6 / 10

unknowns

It's 1955 upstate New York. A group of young women join together to form a gang, Foxfire, to fight back against their tormentors.

Other than Rita, the girls aren't given introductory time to lay out their characters. Margaret "Legs" is the only one to make an impact after that. It doesn't help that these actresses are all unknowns. They need individuality before they can form the commonality of the group. Compared to the 1996 version, this is missing the big name and big charisma like Angelina Jolie. This is a lower budget indie and it doesn't really rise above that. The time period is intriguing. Legs is intriguing. The general premise is intriguing. The rest is not.

Reviewed by i-spookie 8 / 10

Foxfire 1996 - Foxfire 2012

Now - this is a totally different film from the 1996 version - that was an Angelina Joly display - and I loved it. The 2012 film is so much darker and has so much more integrity than film nr. 1 - yet the sexual sphere was less in this film. The boys got away totally - I mean the high-school thugs - but it concentrated on the promiscuous dirty old men. But than again that would not have worked without the gangs physical involvement. I do'nt get that - "dirty old men" are formed in early years- why not address it - like nr. 1 did. I have not red the book, only seen both movies but I am bewildered. I liked nr 1 because of Angelina Joly, but I liked nr 2 better because of it's message - STAY OUT OF CRIME !!!!

Reviewed by ready4fun01 2 / 10

2 hours and 15 minutes I'll never get back.

This film was only marginally a 2...it really deserved a 1. A few of the actresses were decent some of the time...but overall this was a total waste of film, and a total waste of my time to watch. There was nothing about the plot or the characterizations that made me want to keep going after the first 30 minutes...but I kept persevering, although I should have gone with my first impulses and stopped then. The only thing in the whole movie which wasn't a waste of time was the soundtrack--some good choices of more obscure '50s jump boogie contrasting with the more mainstream pop of the era. As for the more recent music in the movie, I don't have anything good to say about Taylor Kirk except that he seems a Leonard Cohen wannabe. Poor scripting, marginal acting, bad accents...and although I've never read the Joyce Carol Oates book on which it was based, I know now why I don't want to. I've also never seen the earlier movie based on the book, but I certainly saw nothing in this movie that would make me want to watch another crack at the same material. If you have any interest in good filmmaking, don't waste your time watching this trash.

Read more IMDb reviews

2 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment