Action / Drama / Romance

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 100%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 78%
IMDb Rating 7 10 1705


Uploaded By: OTTO
Downloaded 46,561 times
February 11, 2015 at 02:47 PM



Leslie Caron as Fanny
Horst Buchholz as Marius
Maurice Chevalier as Panisse
Charles Boyer as Cesar
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
881.17 MB
23.976 fps
2hr 14 min
P/S 3 / 1
1.96 GB
23.976 fps
2hr 14 min
P/S 0 / 1

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by ElMaruecan82 7 / 10

A honorable and laudable attempt to capture the charm of the original "Marseilles" trilogy...

I won't play the "movie purist" card and pretend that it's not possible to remake Marcel Pagnol's "Marseilles" trilogy, it IS possible. But it's not possible to replace an actor like Raimu, he wasn't just César the gruff and wise barkeeper on Marseilles' waterfront, he was the soul of Marseilles' trilogy, he was the voice, the spirit… and the star. So, it's as hard imagining the trilogy without him than "Casablanca" without Bogart. Yet Raimu died before the final opus "César" was made into a play, and Pagnol's three-part story had such an immediate international resonance that it was begging for remakes and adaptations… and that it inspired a successful Broadway musical is a credit to the universality of the story. So the show had to go on.

But no one can replace Raimu, and in fact, even the other players, Orane Demazis who played the fragile but progressively confident Fanny, Fernand Charpin who played the brave bourgeois Panisse, not to mention Pierre Fresnay as the bitter and tormented Marius were all hard to replace, so one must make the distinction between remaking and retelling. This is what Joshua Logan's "Fanny" does, it reprises the Broadway musical but adapts it into the movie format, compacting the three original movies into one of two hours and ten minutes. The film is colored and colorful, magnificently rendering the sunny soul of Marseilles, and the blueness look even more attractive and hypnotic for Marius whose childhood dream is to escape from the banality of life. He's the freest character of the trilogy, but not the wisest.

Wisdom belongs to César, the barkeeper, and the film tactfully starts with a replay of the famous scene where he shows his son Marius that it takes one third of four different ingredients to make some cocktail. There can't be four thirds, Marius says. It depends on the size of the thirds, retorts César. This scene demonstrates the power of this character, even when he speaks nonsense, he's actually right because he always makes his point. He's the touchstone of a saga of French intonations but that deals with universal life themes such as duty, gender roles and social customs, making almost a hero out of an old man marrying a young woman because he's saving her from disgrace and gives a poor out-of-wedlock child a name. Marseilles' trilogy belongs to the past but that doesn't prevent from rooting for Marius' dreams, Fanny's unfaithful thoughts and Panisse's financial arguments when he woos Fanny, César is actually the most transparent of all, no wonder he's the pillar of the story.

Now, it all comes down to one question: does Joshua Logan's "Fanny" do justice to the original trilogy? It is a matter of opinion and depends on the way you look at the original trilogy. If it's a verbal masterpiece with great insightful quotes about life and death, such as "honor being like a match, you only use it once" or "an empty chair can be sadder than a grave" then yes, "Fanny" of 1961 is a great tribute to Pagnol's eloquence and capability to translate with the right words the emotional complexities of human psyche. Now, if you forever associate the film to the spectacular performance of Raimu, these intimate moments caught in black-and-white, with a few tear-pulling revelations, volcanic tirades and histrionic confrontations, you might find in "Fanny" a pale imitation. But for the film's defense, I don't think anyone ever tried to imitate an actor, one of the film's masterstrokes was to cast French actors, it's twice an excellent idea, they're all aware of the trilogy's reputation and their accent give the film's French touch.

Charles Boyer was believable as a man who'd embody César's psychological traits without being Raimu's César, Leslie Caron added her own dimension of tragic melancholy and even Maurice Chevalier was surprisingly poignant as the unsung hero Panisse. I could even have seen him nominated instead of Boyer. Horst Bucholz was good as Marius, with a sort of Montgomery Clift's fire burning in his dark eyes, and like a good cocktail, Joshua Logan doesn't take the initial trilogy for granted, he changed the balance and gave Fanny and Panisse get the most important roles, maybe only Raimu could have made a passive observer like César such a driving force. But "Fanny" is structured in such a way that the actions sometimes count more than the little introspective moments, even though they spiced up the original trilogy.

So maybe that's the one flaw I'd concede to "Fanny", it puts a lot of good things together but it lacks that little zest that made the first trilogy such a tasty cocktail. And while it provides some powerful emotional moments, the conclusion is treated in a rather rushed away, with a ten-year old boy and a new house in the countryside. I don't know what inspired these artistic licenses, but it sadly took away the film from the atmosphere and the spirit it had set up, there's a sort of change in the air that feels awkward and make hardly believable that so many secrets, revelations, pains and troubles would be relieved in one day, ten minutes in cinematic language, and while I was critical of Césariot's character in the original film, the child doesn't exactly exude realistic vibes and his immediate complicity with Marius was sadly corny.

"Fanny" doesn't shine right away but there are like two hours of the film that work and despite a clumsy beginning and awkward ending, it doesn't ruin the enjoyment for all that, I'd still recommend watching the original first. In fact, I'd recommend the original, period.

Reviewed by Martin Bradley 9 / 10

A sentimental triumph

Joshua Logan's film of "Fanny" began life as Marcel Pagnol's Marseilles Trilogy, (Fanny, Marius and Cesar, the three films that made up that trilogy), later condensed to a Broadway musical which Logan directed. This film version arrived in 1961, keeping the musical's structure but minus the (not particularly memorable) songs and it's a sentimental triumph. It's set in Marseilles and tells the story of Fanny, the 18 year old daughter of a fish-seller, Marius, the boy she loves, Cesar, Marius' father and Panisse, the old sail-maker who marries Fanny to give her illegitimate child by Marius, a name after Marius has gone off to sea, unaware that he is to be a father.

For this version Logan was canny enough to cast Charles Boyer as Cesar, Maurice Chevallier as Panisse and Leslie Caron as Fanny and a largely French supporting cast. The German-born Horst Buchholz is Marius and although he never sounds French, for once he doesn't disgrace himself. However, Caron, Boyer and especially Chevallier are outstanding. Boyer picked up an Oscar nomination for Best Actor though personally I think it should have gone to a hardly ever better Chevallier. Caron, too, was unlucky enough to miss out on a Best Actress nomination although the film was nominated for Best Picture.

I've always felt Logan was among the most underrated of great American directors, (Truffaut was a big fan). He worked largely in musicals and melodramas but never achieved the critical adulation heaped on Minnelli; not that he was ever in Minnelli's class. Still, he produced some sterling work, if no actual masterpieces. "Fanny", long unseen, is definitely one of his best films.

Reviewed by JLRMovieReviews 10 / 10

Leslie Caron & Company Shine in a Romance Classic!

Based on Pagnol's "La Trilogie Marseillaise" and Joshua Logan's play, this tells the story of Fanny (Leslie Caron.) She has loved Horst Buchholz ever since she could remember and he her, but the trouble is he never did anything about it, but torture himself over it and over his unhappiness with his lot in life, tending bar in his father's little waterfront cafe. He dreams of sailing on the high seas. But he hasn't the heart or gumption to get up and leave, due mainly for his love for Fanny. His father, Cesar, is played wonderfully by Charles Boyer and an older suitor of Fanny's is Panisee (Maurice Chevalier,) a widower, who is three times her age. The film begins with Fanny teasing Marius (Horst,) letting Panisse flirt with her in the cafe with Marius cleaning all around her. Ultimately, Panisse proposes to her and Marius is on the verge on leaving when they have a final confrontation about their situation, when the ship is in port and about to sail; but this is only after they have finally confessed their love for each other. From there, we are shown the repercussions for their emotional actions. This is a very humorous and charming film, and at the same time, it's one of the most deeply felt movies I have ever seen. I can't tell you when I first saw this or how many times I've seen it. But this simple yet beautiful tale is one of my all-time favorite films - ever! Much love is felt and shared. Much respect for all characters is given. The entire cast is outstanding! The people are real and we are invested in them. their feelings, their mistakes, their humanity. With breathtaking scenery and a beautiful score, this is a must-see Leslie Caron film. This may not be put in the category or conversation as "Gigi' or "An American in Paris," but I don't know why not. Miss this and you have missed a true romantic's film.

Read more IMDb reviews


Be the first to leave a comment