Sidney Lumet's film version of E.L. Doctorow's novel THE BOOK OF DANIEL is beautifully done and deeply heartfelt, but somehow falls short of becoming a classic. As the disillusioned son of Rosenbergian parents, Timothy Hutton is terrific as he tries to figure out what his parents lives were all about and what their deaths meant. Hutton brings the perfect sadness to his role and he's matched by Amanda Plummer as his very angry and ultimately self-destructive sister. Like the Doctorow book, the films bends time telling the parallel stories of Hutton and Plummer along with that of their doomed parents. It's not always smooth, but it's mostly powerful stuff. A major deficit is the casting of Mandy Patinkin and Lindsay Crouse as the parents. They're two of the most affected actors around and they're difficult to sympathize with. The large supporting cast includes Tovah Feldshuh, Ellen Barkin, Maria Tucci, John Rubenstein, and Ed Asner, who gives a great performance as the parent's lawyer.

I knew about DANIEL for years because it's one of Sidney Lumet's less remembered movies and since I am like the major expert on lesser movies (judging from most of the titles I rated and/or reviewed here in 8 years), one day I would have finally seen it. That day arrived last June, and I found it merely ok.

When it begins we hear Daniel Isaacson's (Timothy Hutton) voice explaining how the electric chair works and after these first minutes we are introduced to the Isaacson family when Daniel's sister Susan (Amanda Plummer) becomes obsessed with revolution and Daniel thinks that his family is kinda marked. This because his parents Paul (Mandy Patinkin) and Rochelle are accused of being Soviet spies, so Daniel will investigate until their parents' unevitable execution.

I liked and disliked DANIEL. From one hand Sidney Lumet's style is evident, and the acting by Hutton in the title role and Plummer as his sister was great. But on the other hand it's a bit too long considering the subject matter and I think that if they would have cut 25 minutes it would have been better. Also, scenes of the present are intervowen with scenes and Daniel and Susan when they grew in an institution because they weren't allowed to stay in the same household with their parents, and the cuts were simply a distraction. Yet, but this counts as another plus, the execution scenes were very realistic like when they happened in real life (and still happen in a few States).

Overall, a mixed bag from one of America's most acclaimed directors but if you can separate its shortcomings from its strong points, you still have a decent story with some great acting, and for this reason alone I would recommend it since it's also available on YouTube.

In filming E.L. Doctorow's fictionalized account of the Rosenberg case and its implications for the children of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Sidney Lumet brought a good vision to the finished product. Lumet grew up in those times and had I'm sure peripheral associations with the kind of people that would have gone the same way as Julius and Ethel or in the case of the film and novel, Paul and Rochelle Isaacson. Lumet's love of New York also helps a lot in this film.

The fictionalized Rosenbergs are played by Mandy Patinkin and Lindsay Crouse. We get the idealism of the Rosenbergs, the history of persecution they felt, the empathy for other minorities. It should never be forgotten that it was Communists for their own reasons, but still were the first ones to take up black civil rights as a group cause. Radical politics and all, Patinkin and Crouse give their children a fine set of universal values to live by.

The real Rosenberg sons were adopted by another couple and to this day still try and claim a good legacy for their parents. In the film the title role of Daniel is played by Timothy Hutton and his sister is played by Ellen Barkin. Years after the executions of their parents they have continued the radical traditions of the parents, but they're into the protest politics of the sixties, involved in a mass movement the parents only dreamed about, but hardly under the auspices of the Communist Party USA.

Barkin is caught up in the moment, but Hutton wants to clear his parent's names. In real life it was Ethel Rosenberg's brother David Greenglass who fingered both of them as Communist spies. Greenglass was assigned as a sergeant to Los Alamos and purportedly did the actual stealing of the atomic bomb design. In other words for the kids it was a beloved uncle.

They should have kept that part of the story, but I'm willing to bet that E.L. Doctorow did not want to be sued by David Greenglass who is still alive now, so a family friend and hanger-on with the Communists played by Joseph Leon is the informer.

The highlight of the film is the confrontation scene with Hutton and Tovah Feldshuh playing the daughter of Joseph Leon. The growing up experiences of both are laid out naked and bare, the acting is some of the best both these players have ever done.

In real life Julius Rosenberg was guilty of being a ringleader of a nest of Communist spies. Ethel Rosenberg's guilt is far more problematic, the closest you could come to here is Mrs. Mary Surratt who ran the boardinghouse where Booth and his fellow conspirators met in the Lincoln assassination plot. Her son was part of the ring, but he fled the country so the country in the ill tempered mood it was in, countenanced the hanging of the mother instead. Ethel was probably supportive of her husband's activities as a dutiful wife and nothing more.

What is also clear is that the US government threw out the rulebook when it came to due process in the prosecution of the case. It was the times, you had to have been there.

Although it's not the real story, no more than Billy Bathgate was about Dutch Schultz, E.L. Doctorow and Sidney Lumet weave a very fine tale about some troubled times.