Flatliners

2017

Action / Drama / Horror / Mystery / Sci-Fi / Thriller

156
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 4% · 79 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 32% · 10K ratings
IMDb Rating 5.2/10 10 50718 50.7K

Please enable your VPN when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPN, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Private VPN

Plot summary

Five medical students, hoping to understand the mystery of what lies beyond life, embark on a dangerous experiment. When their hearts are stopped for a short period of time, they have a near-death experience…


Uploaded by: FREEMAN
December 14, 2017 at 05:20 AM

Top cast

Ellen Page as Courtney
Nina Dobrev as Marlo
Kiefer Sutherland as Dr. Barry Wolfson
Tyler Hynes as Lane
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
807.91 MB
1280*534
English 2.0
PG - 13
23.976 fps
1 hr 49 min
Seeds 4
1.67 GB
1920*800
English 2.0
PG - 13
23.976 fps
1 hr 49 min
Seeds 14

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Quinoa1984 3 / 10

More like... STUPID-LINERS RIGHT?

Look, a lot of remakes or reboots or whatever you want to call them (Rebooquel sounds like something that might come from outer space so the less said the better), they are the same because they are based on the foundations of either good or great films - sometimes they can be something else that is interesting, but with the rare exceptions they don't improve on the originals. Flatliners had the potential, however, to be something more since the 1990 Joel Schumacher film was not very good, though it certainly had its ambitions and young stars who were game for a Frankenstein-cum-Elm-Street premise. The saddest thing is the remake does nothing visually to distinguish itself, and more infuriatingly does diddly squat at the script level to find new ideas for its premise.

Think about it: you can get someone to use some medical equipment to stop your heart, wait for a minute or two (or more!) while you are dead, and then can resurrect you so one can see what you went through while in that almost-all-gone phase of deadness. Is there a "light" at the end of the tunnel, or anything else? That's the meat that the 1990 Flatliners hung itself on, and while the script was mostly (surprisingly) under-cooked, in Schumacher there were no lack of off the wall visual ideas and the production design was off-balance, but it was certainly never boring. The 2017 Flatliners from the Swedish "Dragon Tattoo" director Oprev (and written by, of all people, the guy who scripted Source Code) is not interesting visually or striking in any way. This has the visual panache of tax attorney.

There is also some major mistaking going on at the casting level; at the least when you had that movie back in the 90's, you had that cast who had charisma to burn and could play off each other well (Oliver Platt had something to prove, man!) Here, with the exception of Ellen Page, no one is really bringing anything to the table and what the filmmakers have them do through the run time is either run-of-the-mill in terms of the story, or they kill off the *one* character that could keep us engaged with the material. Oh, and Keifer Sutherland shows up as discount House, MD, and what COULD be a connection to the original film - is this a sequel, may-hap - never materializes, making it simply an easy paycheck.

Why was this made if not a chance to explore some narrative or visual possibilities in the genre? Why not make it scary and push the R rating (this is PG-13) for audiences who are ready for a dark, suspenseful psychological thriller where young medical students who should know better have to grapple with the bad s*** they've done? This Flatliners isn't interested in that, either, and each character (Page included, and I don't count Diego Luna as he's the one who doesn't go for the flatlilining, and all we know about him is he's an ex-fireman, so who cares) has one note and only one trauma they have to re-experience in their half-hallucination-half-real state. The flaws from the original are not corrected, and the laziness amplifies it all. Not to mention at 110 minutes this feels punishingly long, and when the aforementioned character is out of the picture there's another half hour to go that feels like FIVE hours.

This is bland, stale, overheated garbage that made me literally BOO in my seat once it was done, not for anyone in particular in the theater, just because I could do it. It's one thing to get a remake that disappoints simply for existing (i.e. Ghostbusters last year), but it's another when you see what could have been in the hands of a twisted, hungry auteur out to show some shocking things - picture, for example, Tarsem circa The Cell, or Leos Carax or something - or a filmmaker who might want to just use the material for a straight drama and not go for the horror, which could also be done. Instead, Flatliners is stupid when it's not dull, and yet it's not stupid often enough to be an overall enjoyably bad movie (I did laugh here and there, but too little and too late). It's everything that is wrong with what SONY is currently doing in an overlong 110 minute package.

Reviewed by Leofwine_draca 3 / 10

Another unnecessary remake

I'm not a huge fan of the original Julia Roberts-starring movie and I'm no fan of remakes either, so I was bound to hate this updated FLATLINERS. The addition of Ellen Page to the mix did me no favours either; she's an actress I consider incredibly overrated and my opinion didn't change on watching this. The new version of FLATLINERS spends a lot of time on set-up but eventually devolves into a cheesy, by-the-numbers style ghost story with a lot of generic material filling out the running time. It has a boring, blue, digital filter-type look and a relatively unknown cast who go through the established character motions. As for the attempts at drama and suspense, they never make a mark. File this under another unnecessary remake attempt.

Reviewed by SnoopyStyle 4 / 10

inferior and unnecessary

Courtney Holmes (Ellen Page) accidentally drives off a bridge with her young sister. Nine years later, she is a medical student working under Dr. Barry Wolfson (Kiefer Sutherland). In the basement of the hospital, she uses unused emergency equipment to do her research on the afterlife. She recruits fellow students rich womanizer Jamie (James Norton) and sweet friend Sophia (Kiersey Clemons). When things go wrong, earnest Ray (Diego Luna) and ambitious Marlo (Nina Dobrev) join the group.

I don't understand why Kiefer can't play the same character. What's the point of bringing him back to the franchise if he's not the same guy? It makes no sense but let's move on. Rebooting this franchise is a questionable move at best but nobody expects more from a stale Hollywood studio. Again, let's move on. The movie has nothing new or special to say. Nevertheless, I love many of these actors and I hoped for the best. When we first move down to the basement, there was a fleeting moment of hope for a functional horror. The afterlife is simply lackluster and may work better without being seen. The original had a horror take which works much better. The new afterlife look and movie in general is simply inferior and worst of all unnecessary.

Read more IMDb reviews

31 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment